TREN DAN DINAMIKA PENELITIAN AKUNTANSI BERKELANJUTAN: TINJAUAN BIBLIOMETRIK TERHADAP PUBLIKASI INTERNASIONAL TERBITAN TAHUN 2010-2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53363/yud.v5i3.167Keywords:
Sustainable Accounting, Bibliometrics, Digital Accounting, ESG, Akuntansi Berkelanjutan, Bibliometrik, Digital Accounting, ESGAbstract
This study aims to map the trends and dynamics of sustainable accounting research at the global level by using a bibliometric approach to international publications during the period 2010 to 2025. By analyzing data from the Scopus database and visualizing it through the VOSviewer software, the study identified the development of the number of publications, collaborations between authors and institutions, as well as the dominant themes in the literature. The results of the analysis show that the topics of digital accounting, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and ESG reporting have increased significantly in the last five years, illustrating the shift in research focus towards digitalization and sustainability in accounting practices. In addition, global collaborations involving countries such as the United States, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan further strengthen interdisciplinary knowledge ecosystems. The study provides theoretical contributions through mapping the knowledge structure in the field of sustainable accounting, as well as practical implications for academics, practitioners, and policymakers in responding to the challenges of digital transformation and the sustainability agenda. These findings also open up opportunities for further research that is conceptually and contextually in-depth.
Downloads
References
Atkins, J., Atkins, B. C., Thomson, I., & Maroun, W. (2015). “Good” news from nowhere: Imagining utopian sustainable accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 651–670.
Baker, M., Gray, R., & Schaltegger, S. (2023). Debating accounting and sustainability: from incompatibility to rapprochement in the pursuit of corporate sustainability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(2), 591–619.
Bebbington, J. (2001). Sustainable development: a review of the international development, business and accounting literature. Accounting Forum, 25(2), 128–157.
Demir, M., & Min, M. (2019). Consistencies and discrepancies in corporate social responsibility reporting in the pharmaceutical industry. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(2), 333–364.
Dimcheva, G. (2023). Theoretical Aspects of Sustainability Accounting. Ikonomiceski i Sotsialni Alternativi, 2, 40–47.
Elidemir, S. N., Ozturen, A., & Bayighomog, S. W. (2020). Innovative behaviors, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083295
Issa, A., & Hanaysha, J. R. (2023). Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: the power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(4), 623–646.
Malsch, B., & Tessier, S. (2015). Journal ranking effects on junior academics: Identity fragmentation and politicization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 84–98.
Mohd, S., & Kaushal, V. K. (2018). Green finance: a step towards sustainable development. MUDRA: Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 59–74.
Mukhtaruddin, M., Ubaidillah, U., Dewi, K., Hakiki, A., & Nopriyanto, N. (2019). Good corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, firm value, and financial performance as moderating variable. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 3(1), 55â – 64.
Ng, A. W. (2018). From sustainability accounting to a green financing system: Institutional legitimacy and market heterogeneity in a global financial centre. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 585–592.
Petricic?, A. E. (2023). The Role of Accountants and the Accounting Profession in Achieving the Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 752–762.
Phillips, R. L., & Ormsby, R. (2016). Industry classification schemes: An analysis and review. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 21(1), 1–25.
Ryszawska, B. (2016). Sustainability transition needs sustainable finance. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(1), 185–194.
Tzilivakis, J., Green, A., Warner, D., McGeevor, K., & Lewis, K. (2012). A framework for practical and effective eco?labelling of food products. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 50–73.
Unerman, J., & Chapman, C. (2014). Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 385–394.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Springer.
Vitale, G., Cupertino, S., Rinaldi, L., & Riccaboni, A. (2019). Integrated management approach towards sustainability: an Egyptian business case study. Sustainability, 11(5), 1244.
Wahyuningrum, I. F. S., Humaira, N. G., Budihardjo, M. A., Arumdani, I. S., Puspita, A. S., Annisa, A. N., Sari, A. M., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2023). Environmental sustainability disclosure in Asian countries: Bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 411, 137195.
Weston, P., & Nnadi, M. (2023). Evaluation of strategic and financial variables of corporate sustainability and ESG policies on corporate finance performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1058–1074.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto, Eka Septariana Puspa, Okevanrianus Putra Hernat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






