PENGARUH NPL, CAR, DAN LDR TERHADAP ROA DI BANK BUKU 4 INDONESIA

Saeful  Fachri; Anis F.  Salam; Nia  Safitri

doi:10.53363/yud.v2i2.36

Authors

Saeful Fachri Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Banten
Anis F. Salam Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Banten
Nia Safitri Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53363/yud.v2i2.36

Keywords:

Non Performing Loan, Capital Adequacy Ratio Loan To Deposit Ratio, Return On Assets

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine whether the Non Performing Loan, Capital Adequacy Ratio and Loan To Deposit Ratio have an effect on Return On Assets. The type of method used is the associative method, the population in this study is 35. Associative research is a study that aims to determine the relationship between two or more variables, so there are independent variables (variables that affect) and dependent (influenced). This study consists of independent variables, namely Non-Perfoarming Loan (X1), Loan to Deposit Ratio (X2) and Capital Adequacy Ratio (X3) and the dependent variable in this study is Return On Asset (Y). The results of the associative analysis show that the Non-Performing Loan, Capital Adequacy Ratio and Loan To Deposit Ratio are good, the results of multiple linear regression show that the regression coefficient value of the NPL variable is -0.557, the regression coefficient value of the CAR variable is 0.116 and the regression coefficient value of the LDR variable is 0.008. While the coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.466, it can be concluded that the magnitude of the effect of NPL, CAR and LDR on ROA is 46.6%. As well as hypothesis testing based on the results of the t-test for the NPL variable, the value of tcount < ttable (-2,015 < 1,693), for the CAR variable, the value of tcount > ttable (3.147 > 1.693) and for the LDR variable, the value of tcount < ttable (0.008 > 1.693) ). And based on the results of the F-test, the value of Fcount > Ftable (9.024 > 2.90). The conclusion of this study shows that NPL, CAR and LDR either partially or simultaneously are not significant and significant to ROA

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar, C. J. (2021). Analisis Alokasi Kredit Mikro dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Laba Bank. Media Sains Indonesia.

PBI No 15/7/PBI/2013, (2013). https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/regulasi/peraturan-bank-indonesia/Documents/8.pdf

Bernardin, D. E. Y. (2016). Pengaruh Car Dan Ldr Terhadap Return on Assets. IV(2), 232–241. http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ecodemica

Bia?as, M., & Solek, A. (2010). Evolution of capital adequacy ratio. Economics and Sociology, 3(2), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2010/3-2/5

Candra, Y., Natasia, K., & Fenia, Z. S. (2021). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Dharma Andalas. Hubungan Antara Kontrol Diri Dengan Perilaku Konsumtif Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMAN 10 Padang, 23(1), 185–194.

Fauziyyah, H. S., & Nurismalatri, N. (2021). Pengaruh Npl Dan Bopo Terhadap Roa Pada Sektor Bank Bumn Periode 2015-2020. Jurnal Arastirma, 1(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.32493/arastirma.v1i2.12356

Garrouste, P., & Saussier, S. (2008). The theories of the firm. New Institutional Economics: A Guidebook, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754043.004

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hidayati, L. N. (2015). Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal ... Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 12, 38–50. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/100829-ID-pengaruh-kecukupan-modal-car-pengelolaan.pdf

Indonesia Financial Services Authority (OJK). (2020). Indonesia Banking Statistics 2020. 19(01), 1–170. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-indonesia/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Indonesia---Desember-2020.aspx

Latifah, N., Rodhiyah, R., & Saryadi, S. (2012). Pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio (Car), Non Performing Loan (Npl) Dan Loan To Deposit Ratio (Ldr) Terhadap Return on Asset (Roa) (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa Go Public Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2009-2010). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis S1 Undip, 1(1), 57–66.

Maulana, P., Dwita, S., & Helmayunita, N. (2021). Pengaruh CAR, NPL, LDR dan BOPO Terhadap Return ON Assets (ROA) pada Bank yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2019. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 3(2), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v3i2.355

OJK. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No 15/POJK.03/2017. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 7. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/perbankan/regulasi/peraturan-ojk/Documents/Pages/POJK-tentang-Penetapan-Status-dan-Tindak-Lanjut-Pengawasan-Bank-Umum/SAL POJK 15 Exit Policy Bank Umum.pdf

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). POJK No. 6/POJK.03/2016. Kegiatan Usaha Dan Jaringan Kantor Berdasarkan Modal Inti Bank, 1–29. www.ojk.go.id

Petersson, J., & Wadman, I. (2004). Non Performing Loans - The Markets of Italy and Sweden. Bachelor Thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies, 1–30.

Putrianingsih, D. I., & Yulianto, A. (2016). Pengaruh Non Performing Loan (NPL) dan Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) terhadap Profitabilitas (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2010-2013). Management Analysis Journal, 5(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v5i2.7622

Stevani, & Sudirgo, T. (2019). Analisis CAR, BOPO, NPL, dan LDR Terhadap ROA Perusahaan Perbankan. Jurnal Multiparadigma Akuntansi, I(3), 863–871.

Suciaty, A., Haming, M., & Alam, N. (2019). Pengaruh CAR, BOPO, NPL dan LDR Terhadap ROA pada Bank BUMN Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Center Of Economic Student Journal, 2(1), 58–74.

Utomo, N. R. H. (2021). Pengaruh CAR, TPF, NPL, dan Bank Size terhadap Profitabilitas Sektor Perbankan di BEI. JURNAL STIE SEMARANG, 13(3), 15–38.

Yuhenita, N. N, Indiati, K. A. (2016). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui strategi menghadapi stres. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 5(1), 293–324. https://www.neliti.com/publications/246797/pengaruh-npl-dan-ldr-terhadap-profitabilitas-dengan-car-sebagai-variabel-mediasi